3/15/2023 0 Comments Clockmaker analogyIn fact they rather imply that the two are inseparable aspects of each other. So how do some faiths which also believe that the universe has always existed reconcile with their belief in a creator too? Simple: they say the creator has also always existed. This theory advanced by leading philosophers asserts that God created the universe, but is not actively involved in its operation, just as a clockmaker makes a clock that then operates independently of him. This is where the design argument collapses completely because if a watch was never made but always existed, it obviously wouldn't require ��� or even imply ��� a watchmaker since only something that's been created needs a creator. After conclusively proving God’s existence, it is incumbent upon us to deal with a subject in philosophy called the Clock Maker Theory. More importantly, they think that the current expansion of the universe was preceded by the collapsing phase of a previous universe which went through a Big Crunch and bounced out into this one.īasically, this means everything was not created when scientists used to think it was but also existed before that. Scientists are beginning to think that the Big Bang model of the creation of the universe may not be correct after all.Īccording to some theories of quantum gravity everything in existence today could not have been packed into a singular point of infinite density, temperature and curvature. Which natural process created that?Īlthough the rebuttal may seem iron-clad, a fatal chink in its armour may now be developing through the field of cosmology which can strike it a death blow. Thus if we say that the location of mountains can be described by plate tectonics or biological structures by natural selection and planetary systems by the nebular hypothesis, watchmaker proponents can always come back with: yes but these natural processes are the result of the creation of the universe. The reasoning is so viscerally persuasive that despite advances made by science to explain complex phenomenon in terms of natural processes, its lure is still tempting. In other words, just like the design of a watch implies a designer, so does the design of the universe. It was first formulated by the British Christian. But since the universe is vastly more complex and gigantic than a human artefact, it must have been designed by a vastly more powerful and intelligent designer. The watchmaker argument is commonly used as an argument to prove intelligent design. Score: 4.9/5 ( 39 votes) The watchmaker analogy or watchmaker argument is a teleological argument which states, by way of an analogy, that a design implies a designer, especially intelligent design an intelligent designer, i.e. Therefore the universe must be a product of intelligent design (or purpose) too. Briefly, it goes thus: Human artefacts are products of intelligent design (or purpose) and the universe resembles such artefacts. William Paley, the 18th century Christian philosopher is famous for popularising the Watchmaker Analogy or, as it's more commonly known now, the argument from design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |